Saturday, December 23, 2017

Good King Wencelsas: Champion of the Poor

The Good King


Tom Manoff filed an interesting story on NPR about The Duke of Bohemia, King Wenceslas. The carol has been one of my favorites for a long time. (even more fun than the wassailing tune). Wenceslas was an early advocate of social justice and an early Christian. The last line of the carol sums up the King's Christian mission. "Ye who now will bless the poor / shall yourselves find blessing." 

Perhaps, a good reminder for the 1%, or at least the politicians who seem to be their champions.
 
Take a moment to listen to Manoff's report on NPR.


The Evil Bother


According to an article in Wikipedia he was the duke of Bohemia from 921 until his assassination in 935. His younger brother, Boleslaus the Cruel, was complicit in the murder. A group of nobles allied with Boleslaus plotted to kill him. The King was invited to a feast. At the feast three of the nobles attacked him. His brother is said to have Wenceslas through with a lance.

Is it a case of no good deed goes unpunished? Boleslaus and his allies acted to take control at a time of increasing tensions with the German Provinces. Boleslaus may have also been influenced by his pagan mother in a reaction to the growing influence of Christianity. Boleslaus later repented and became a Christian.

There's more about Wenceslas and traditional caroling  at"On Point."





Sunday, December 3, 2017

Public Broadcasting's Upward Trend



Data provided by the Pew Research Center shows modest yet steady growth among Public Radio's news oriented stations. Data shows increases from 2015 to 2016.

Take a look at these trends. How does the data from your station stack up against the benchmarks established by national trends?  (If you need help with that, let me know.)


  • Listenership if up 11% among the top 20 station.
  • NPR programming is up 14%.
  • PRI Programming is up 12.5%.
  • Public Radio's digital presence is on the rise.
  • PBS NewsHour grew 22%.
  • Revenue went up at the national level for NPR and PRI. APM saw a decrease. According to Pew, "At the national level NPR increased its total operating revenue in 2016 to $213 million, up 9% from 2015 levels. PRI saw gains as well, rising 26% to about $22 million in total revenue for 2016. APM’s total revenue, on the other hand, went down 6% year over year, accounting for $126 million in 2016."
  • Locally, earnings have been relatively flat.
  • News oriented station increased investment in their news gathering resourced about 5% from 2014 to 2015.
  • Viewership for commercial network news declined 1% to 24 million viewers.
  • Cable news networks increased 55% to 4.8 million viewers.
  • Newspaper subscriptions dropped 8% between 2015 and 2016. Subscriptions are up slightly since the election.




Friday, December 1, 2017

Your Schedule Matters

I recently saw a posting from somebody in charge of content at a public radio station wondering about what program she could acquire to replace "Dinner Party Download." The question made me pause. As somebody who was once in charge of content at a small statewide network, I worked diligently to create a consistency in programming. The question for me was not about individual programs, but about the service as a whole.

Coming out of the 80's, public radio was in a quest to create a consistent appeal through the selection of content that had a affinity. Disparate programs could have that affinity, but that does not mean that all content worked well with other content. One of the discoveries was that patchwork programming resulted in barriers and rifts in the audience. The more programs in the daily program grid would likely result in audience churn and lower time spent listening and lower core loyalty. The idea was to create consistency across day parts. A question that was often asked of PD's in those early days was, "Can you tell me what is on the air at your station right now?" Programmers with a crazy quilt of programs had a hard time answering that question.

The big discoveries were the inconsistent appeals between news content and music programming like classical and jazz...and the opera with everything else in public radio. But, even content that on the surface seemed to have consistent affinity and appeal might not have. At a network in the Midwest with a consistent schedule of locally produced talk shows had problems of churn. The audience was not carrying over from program to program. The audience was defined by the programs not the programming. The loyalty was built among a micro-set of listeners and did not carry over to other programs or day parts. The host would sign-off and so would the audience.

The station mentioned above has been drifting toward patchwork programming with inconsistencies in program selection horizontally across hours. That's a problem because radio listening is habitual. Listeners tend to tune in at the same time everyday. If the programming they seek is not there, they tune away.

Public station that perform well with their audience have a consistency across day parts and even horizontally across hours.  Look at stations that perform well and take note of the consistency of their schedules.

The question should be, "How can I best serve my audience and my community." There are so many good programs. How do you make room for them all? You can't. You're the gatekeeper. You need to make the decisions. It's never been easy. For example, What are you supposed to do with something like "Science Friday?" You can only answer that question by looking at the numbers. Make informed decisions and measure the results.