Poor Health Coverage/Poor Reporting

Public says news coverage of health care law shortchanges practical information

Pew research says most of us are unhappy with the way the Affordable Care Act is being covered. According to Pew a majority of Americans say the news media’s coverage of the law has been focused on politics and controversies, rather than how it will impact people. By focusing on the rhetoric, the public is being shortchanged on the facts on how the plan will affect them.

The Kaiser Health Track Survey (the source for the survey) suggests the reporting on the issue has resulted in a lack of trust of the media on this issue.

"More than half (53%) of those surveyed say there is not a news media source that they trust for information about the health law; 44% said there were news outlets they trusted. Of those who said they trust one or multiple news sources, 19% cited cable TV, with 10% naming Fox News and 5%  naming CNN. Broadcast TV outlets and newspapers ranked second at 7% each."

I clicked through to the Kaiser Health Tracking Poll. Only 3% trust NPR's coverage and 2% trust PBS' coverage. The coverage of late on NPR has been more about how the ACA will be implemented but, public perception is that public broadcasting's coverage is not to be trusted. This runs counter to public broadcasting's perception that it the nation's most trusted news source.  http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/02/4th-annual-tv-news-trust-poll.html

Stretching the Meaning

This may be a stretch but, an interpretation of the research may be that the public is tired of the partisan politics perpetuated by cable news outlets like Fox, MSNBC and conservative pundits. The controversy is wearing all of us out when the real story is how the ACA is going to work. "How is this change going to affect my health coverage?" Partisan politics and partisan media coverage that fuels the partisan divide is getting us nowhere.

WNPR.ORG coming back Updated

This is long overdue. Wnpr.org was supplanted a few years ago by yourpublicmedia.org in an effort to create a more robust news website. WNPR took a risk when they did this. The move abandoned a really effective branding...WNPR. It also led to confusion. They were always talking about two websites and one of them took the listener away from WNPR. When the change was made it was deemed necessary because the experience of navigating through the CPBN site was frustrating. Unfortunately the move to yourpublicmedia.org left listeners confused. The question was...are you WNPR or are you Your Public Media?

Why did the change fail? I think the motivation for the change was internally driven. It was not driven by the user experience. To make things worse, the partnerships developed with yourpublicmedia never really evolved. It was always hard to find WNPR's content on the site. At least from my perspective, the user experience was frustrating when trying to find stories aired on WNPR. I gave up.

Now all they have to do is find the resources needed to keep the site updated and relevant.

Music for Change (Another Mix Tape)

Autumn arrives Saturday. With the change of seasons it's to think about making changes.  It also a time for new beginnings. The school year begins. For some companies the new fiscal year starts October First.

I've come up with a few tunes about changes. Some are obvious. Some deal with the subject indirectly. As always, your suggestions are welcome.

See You In September - The Happenings
September in the Rain - Frank Sinatra
Wake me Up When September Ends - Green Day
September Song - Willie Nelson
Autumn Leaves - Cannonball Adderley
Changes - David Bowie
A Change is Gonna Come - Sam Cooke
Everybody Oughta Make a Change - Eric Clapton
Change Partners - Stephen Stills

Change Partners - Antonio Carlos Jobim/Frank Sinatra
Different Today - Kenny White
Something in the Air - Thunderclap Newman

Staff Reductions at NPR

I hate this. It brings back bad memories of when CPBN was going through another round of layoffs. There were many of those at CPBN. For a lot of reasons I knew mine was coming. I could only wait for that shoe to drop. It was an awful feeling. 

Employees at NPR are going through that feeling now. According to an article in the Everett Herald, NPR is offering buyouts to reduce staff by 10%. (Public radio offers buyouts to cut staff 10%)
The reduction is being put in place to offset a $6.1 million deficit. All this comes on the heels of the announced resignation of Gary Knell. Knell is leaving to become CEO of the National Geographic Society. Paul Hagga, Jr. become the interim CEO on September 30.

the RIF will intensify the debate on how NPR funds itself and, where they should be spending their revenue. Can the network sustain itself with a combination of funding from Member's dues and underwriting? Will NPR need to bypass the stations and go directly to the listeners? If NPR cuts out the stations, what then? Has there been too much emphasis on new media efforts and not enough on it's core...the radio audience? Or, has radio become become a cash cow with slowing receding fiscal relevance?

Fundraising - Do we talk about ourselves or the donor?

Focusing on Donors, Not the Charity, in Your Appeals

Check out this podcast from the Chronicle of Philanthropy. So much of what I hear and read...especially on public radio and television...is all about "we need." "Another big pitch is, "We're great! Support us!" There's also an addiction to the premium. There's a fear nobody will give unless we're immersed in the give and get. I'm hearing this on both radio and TV.

We can go beyond fundraising that annoys and drives listener's and viewers away? Public radio loses half its audience as soon as it opens its mikes during a fund drive. Public Television can't raise money around its core programs. Is it the programming creating the problem for Public TV? 
When something compelling hits the air like Downton Abbey, the funds flow in. 

Answer this, "What are the positive outcomes from the listener's or viewer's point of view?" 

A thank you gift or a pair of tickets is not a positive outcome. It is an inducement.